Change is about leverage

So it Go

In recent weeks, probably propelled by fading hopes for “a new day” with our new Parliament, we have seen some stirring letters to the press citing Guyana’s diverse difficulties and calling for the citizenry to become more socially active. In a very prominent letter, eloquently declaring his distress, Joe Singh laid out the scenario effectively noting, among other things, the “fissures within the fabric of our society along the fault lines of politics and ethnicity” that continue to bedevil us.  Joe’s description of our situation as “becoming unacceptably claustrophobic and debilitating” must have resonated with many people in this country.

Columnist Ravi Dev has expressed similar concerns, proposing a federal solution. We saw Hubert Roberts suggesting the revival of the Guyanese Action for Reform and Democracy (GUARD), and another writer brought up the possibility of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to relieve ethnic tensions. Eusi Kwayana, as his wont, added valuable weight to the debate.

20130210daveIn the wake of these expressions, Emile Mervin wrote praising the output but then going on to ask the “what next” question.  Emile’s suggestion for “ideas” instead of polemic is pertinent to this process because ultimately it is where the conversation of change stalls.

The letters cited above and others are coming essentially from individuals concerned with the state of their country and understandably anxious for change, but the folks to whom they are writing, the ones they have to galvanize, don’t know where to go, who to talk to, what to do, to make change.  There is no defined path. That situation is behind Emile’s comment.

Civic transformation in a country takes place in diverse ways.  It can come from a charismatic individual who almost single-handedly manhandles the problem, sometimes in perilous circumstances (Fidel Castro, Juan Peron, Bobby Kennedy) pulling the people along with the issue.  Caesar Chavez, in his struggle for farm workers’ rights in the USA is a prime example.  By the very nature of their approach, such leaders are rare.  We don’t seem to have such a unique leader among us.

Change can also come from a community group such as we had at one time with the village councils where citizens could come together and air grievances and agitate for responses.

This apparatus, dispersed during the socialism years, is not much in play either, and the form that replaced it has become politicized over time.

Change can come from institutions commonly seen in developed societies (human rights, civil rights, environment, justice, commerce, etc) where attention can be raised in specialized areas and significant measured pressure can be placed on the establishment for change.

Again, many such institutions in Guyana have become inactive or even neutered in the past 30 years so that we are lacking this lever in the effort to make change.

Change can come via international pressure from governments that have an economic or political stake in the country involved.  Obvious recent examples of this are in the oil-rich countries (Iraq, Iran) and in the changes in Middle Eastern dictatorships around them.  Guyana is not in that category; once we don’t start invading anybody (also unlikely) our problems don’t rise to the level of concern for a Washington or a London; they have no economic stake in us.

Personal change can also come from individuals taking responsibility to fix things in their own circle of influence, 5 or 6 persons say, and while there is some merit in this the prospects of national change will remain minimal unless a mass movement catches fire, like the American youth protest of the American war in Vietnam.

Our history, after the slave uprisings, shows no such focused movements.

Occasionally, it can come from an incident as in the horrific mass killing of young children in the USA that galvanized latent concerns about the prevalence of military weapons in common use there.  It will be interesting to see, for example, if the recent tragic loss of life in the Mazaruni will be the incident that finally pushes us here to enforce mandatory life vests for river boat passengers.

In short, the evidence suggests that, some “incident” aside, we will continue to be hampered in this concert for change because we don’t have the mechanisms, or at least any with enough clout, to bring effective pressure to bear on successive governments or opposition MPs.

The voices being raised, many of them movingly so, remain generally an individual push; significant change will require the emergence of institutions and civic groups with the clout and the resolve to be activist, to become levers, and that development will require time and patience and personal involvement by many while the problems fester. Ultimately the single voice achieves little beyond the satisfaction of the shout. Whether criticizing the Government or the Opposition, they can be dismissed, and are dismissed, mathematically – they don’t represent numbers.

The attitude is there, comically but realistically, in the famous retort from former Trinidad PM Eric Williams reacting to the calypsonian The Mighty Chalkdust who wrote stinging critical calypsoes about Williams and his PNM party.  Asked for a comment on the singer, Williams said, “Let the jackass bray.”   If Chalkdust had been one of a number of people complaining in unison, Eric Williams would not have dared to dismiss them with “Let the jackasses bray.”

The alerts by Joe Singh and others are valuable and are to be commended, but the point by Emile Mervin remains.  Until we have channels or groups or institutions representing large numbers of people, coming to these issues, the chances for significant or radical change will remain low.  The arithmetic is against it; we simply don’t have enough numbers shouting.

Given our recent history, it would be natural for us to be sceptical that such mechanisms will emerge, but without them the powers that be can continue to pay scant attention to the individual shout. In the final analysis, change is about leverage.

default placeholder

Peru’s president-elect demands freedoms in Venezuela

Peru’s pro-business President-elect Pedro Pablo Kuczynski won his country’s elections by a hair with the last-minute help of a leftist party, but — judging from what he told me in an interview — he won’t budge on his criticism of Venezuela and other repressive regimes.

default placeholder

Public financial management: 1966 – present (Final)

This is the fifth and final in a series of articles on the above aimed at highlighting the extent of our achievements in the post-Independence period.

LUCAS STOCK INDEXThe Lucas Stock Index (LSI) rose 0.54 per cent during the third period of trading in June 2016. The stocks of six companies were traded with 79,573 shares changing hands. There were three Climbers and one Tumbler. The stocks of Banks DIH (DIH) rose 1.98 per cent on the sale of 18,757 while the stocks of Demerara Distillers Limited (DDL) rose 5.26 per cent on the sale of 41,667 shares. In addition, the stocks of Demerara Tobacco Company (DTC) rose 1.51 per cent on the sale of 13,603 shares. In contrast, the stocks of Demerara Bank Limited (DBL) fell 5.26 per cent on the sale of 4,324 shares.  In the meanwhile, the stocks of Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry (BTI) and Republic Bank Limited (RBL) remained unchanged on the sale of 222 and 1,000 shares respectively.

Massy and Guyana (Part 1)

Steadfast Last year, this writer looked at the Massy Group of Companies formerly Neal and Massy to gain an understanding of the operations of this company which has been doing business in Guyana for the past 48 years. 

20160626table2jun

Value-added performance of the forest sub-sector: Erratic, weak, declining

Erratic Last week’s column highlighted what I consider to be a most distinctive feature of the extractive forest sub-sector’s performance in Guyana’s economy, during the past decade.

default placeholder

The UK bids Europe farewell

On June 23 by a small majority, the British people voted to remove themselves from the European Union (EU). The decision has consequences for the Caribbean.

default placeholder

What would life be without sport?

I wonder what it would be like to exclude sport completely from one’s life for, say, one year? No playing sport, no watching it, no reading it no discussing it no thinking about it even.

default placeholder

Brexit: Lessons for Caricom

The results of the referendum held in Britain to determine whether or not it should remain in or leave the European Union (EU), has been won by voters who supported the leave option.

Director of Sport Christopher Jones and President of the Guyana Chess Federation Irshad Mohammed (centre) stand with some members of the 2016 Guyana Olympiad chess team. The team travels to Baku, Azerbaijan, for participation at the Olympiad in September. A signature qualifying tournament was not held to determine the members of Guyana’s Olympiad chess team.

Federation picks chess Olympiad team without holding qualifier

The Guyana Chess Federation (GCF) has decided upon a 2016 Guyana Olympiad chess team without hosting a qualification competition to determine the competence of its participants.

Comments

About these comments

The comments section is intended to provide a forum for reasoned and reasonable debate on the newspaper's content and is an extension of the newspaper and what it has become well known for over its history: accuracy, balance and fairness. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments which contain attacks on other users, slander, coarse language and profanity, and gratuitous and incendiary references to race and ethnicity.

Stay updated! Follow Stabroek News on Facebook or Twitter.

Get the day's headlines from SN in your inbox every morning: