Cricket’s decision review system no longer mandatory, says ICC

MUMBAI, (Reuters) – Cricket’s controversial decision  review system (DRS) will no longer be mandatory and its use will  be left to bilateral agreements between participating boards,  the International Cricket Council (ICC) said today.
“Although the DRS improves correct umpire decisions by  around five percent and corrects any blatant errors, there are  some who are not convinced by its reliability,” ICC Chief  Executive Haroon Lorgat said in a statement.
“We will continue to work with interested parties to improve  the system while permitting the participating teams to decide  whether they wish to use it or not.”
The ICC, at its annual conference in June, had made the use  of Hot Spot technology — which indicates the ball’s point of  contact — mandatory, subject to availability, and left the use  of ball-tracking technology up to the playing boards.
The ICC had even won over the Indian cricket board (BCCI),  which had strongly opposed the ball-tracking technology in DRS,  with its modified version that allows teams to challenge umpire  decisions.
The modified version of DRS, minus the ball-tracking  technology but including Hot Spot, was used during India’s  recent tour of England but drew flak for inconsistent results.
“This decision is a recognition that Hot Spot was not as  reliable as we’d have liked it to be,” Lorgat told reporters  following a two-day executive board meeting in Dubai.
“The evidence that came out of the series was not  comforting. There were a number of occasions where Hot Spot did  not detect a traceable mark.”
The ICC’s executive board said it would continue using the  DRS in its global events and would support the use of technology  and its continued development.

BCCI SALVO
The change in the ICC’s stance on DRS followed criticism  last month by the BCCI’s new president N. Srinivasan, who said  the Indian board “did not believe in the ball-tracking  technology at all”.
Lorgat, however, dismissed the idea that the BCCI had forced  its decision on the other members.
“This was a board decision that came out through a  considered debate and eventually there was unanimity that we  need to revert and let those who are comfortable in using it,  use it, and those who are not have the option to decide not to  use it,” he said.
The ICC also said that the decision on whether or not a  world test championship would start in 2013 would be delayed  while it sought agreement from its commercial partners.
The governing body has a contract with broadcaster ESPN STAR  Sports which includes the coverage of the Champions Trophy  tournament that year.
“We’ve got existing commitments in terms of the rights  agreement with a one-day international tournament that we would  need to convert that to a test format and that has got  implications for the broadcast partner,” Lorgat said.