Could the next step in Venezuela’s crisis be a regionally brokered solution?

Amid the massive anti-government protests that have left at least 29 dead and more than 400 wounded, Venezuela’s National Assembly president, Julio Borges — one of the country’s top opposition leaders — told me in an interview that there are behind-the-scenes talks with Latin American presidents to create a “group of friendly countries” that would seek a negotiated solution to the political crisis.

In recent days, Latin America’s biggest nations — including Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Peru and Chile — have signed joint statements demanding the restoration of the National Assembly’s constitutional powers, the release of political prisoners and free elections.

“But there is an additional step that must be taken,” Borges told me. “That step consists of the presidents themselves appointing a group of heads of state or of friendly countries that really put pressure on the Venezuelan government to reach a democratic and constitutional outcome, so that we can have free elections.”

That “group of friendly countries” would replace the failed mediation effort by the Vatican and the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), which was used by President Nicolás Maduro to gain time while staging a de facto coup. During that dialogue, the Maduro regime abolished virtually all powers of the National Assembly, where the opposition had won a majority in the 2015 legislative elections. It also took more political prisoners, and banned top opposition leaders from running for office for up to 15 years.

When I asked Borges whether the opposition will accept Maduro’s new offers of a dialogue in exchange for calling off its protests on the streets, the head of the National Assembly told me: “Any government offer that is not accompanied by guarantees from governments of the region will have zero credibility.”

He added that “more than a new mediation effort, what is needed are guarantees from governments in the region” that Maduro will restore Venezuela’s constitutional order.

The formula of a “group of friendly countries” has been used to seek to solve several Latin American conflicts in recent decades, including the Central American wars of the 1980s and the Colombian armed conflict in the early 2000s. It has also been proposed for Venezuela in the past, but the idea never got off the ground.

Now, the proposal is drawing growing support in Latin America because of the escalation of violence in Venezuela, and because of Maduro’s April 17 announcement that he will give out 500,000 rifles to civilian militias to defend the government on the streets. Venezuela’s neighbours fear that civilians who get these rifles will sell them on the black market.

Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos tweeted hours after Maduro’s announcement that Colombia will bring the issue of “the militarization of Venezuelan society” to the attention of the United Nations.

“Over the past few hours and the past few days, I have had the opportunity to talk with most foreign ministers and several presidents from the region, and this issue — the weapons for the militias — is one that draws the most concern in most of these conversations,” Borges said. “That’s because these weapons will end up not only killing citizens of Venezuela, but also citizens of Colombia, Panama, Peru and Brazil.”

Borges declined to say which presidents or nations could make up a “group of friendly countries.” But I would not be surprised if the opposition picks Argentina — which has just taken over the rotating presidency of UNASUR, and whose president, Mauricio Macri, took a regional message about Venezuela to his April 27 meeting with President Donald Trump — along with Colombia or Peru, and the Maduro regime suggests Panama and Bolivia or Ecuador.

My opinion: Facing a growing death toll from its brutal repression of protesters, growing international isolation following its suspension of South American trade bloc Mercosur and its departure under pressure from the Organization of American States, increasing cracks within the government and an increasingly desperate economic situation, Maduro may have no choice but to accept a “group of friendly countries” to seek a face-saving way out of its crisis.

If the opposition is able to keep the pressure on in the streets, Maduro may have to accept a route to Venezuela’s re-democratization, with free elections supervised by credible international observers this year.

 

 

Comments  

How corruption impedes universal health coverage

By Sania Nishtar ISLAMABAD – Half of the planet cannot access essential health services.

Cheddi Jagan, Communism and the African-Guyanese

By Clem Seecharan Clem Seecharan is Emeritus Professor of History at London Metropolitan University.

Reflections on Cheddi Jagan, 1918-1997

Cheddi Jagan returned from studies in the United States to a British Guiana in 1943 that was a cauldron of poverty.

By ,

The life and times of Dr Cheddi Jagan in pictures

Dr Jagan enjoys a ride on a ferris wheel with his grandchildren. Cheddi Jagan and Forbes Burnham leave then British Guiana to plead their case abroad, following the suspension of the constitution by the British in 1953.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built stabroeknews.com using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now

×