Not all the people in the hinterland are Amerindians

Dear Editor,
Whenever there is some new development in the hinterland the headline reads Amerindians now have access to whatever, whether it be water or electricity.

The point I am trying to make is that if you look at the ethnic make up of these regions you would see that the people are not 100% Amerindians.

Whenever there is report on Buxton, for example, the headline never reads “African Guyanese now have greater access to new development” and in a report  on Lusignan the headline never reads “East Indians now have greater access to a health facility.”
Yours faithfully,
S Khan