Germany calls carbon tariffs “eco-imperialism”

ARE, Sweden, (Reuters) – European Union environment  chiefs warned against trying to impose “carbon tariffs” on  countries that do not join a global deal on tackling greenhouse  gases, but France said they could be used as a last resort.

Rich nations are worried that by making their industries pay  for permits to emit carbon dioxide they will lose market share  to cheaper imports from countries with no such carbon curbs.  Border tariffs could be used to level the playing field.

France says carbon tariffs could play a role if countries  fail to agree a global climate deal in Copenhagen in December,  but Germany called the idea a form of “eco-imperialism” and a  direct violation of WTO rules.

The issue of greenhouse tariffs has met bitter opposition  from developing countries such as China and India, which count  on the developed world to buy their exports to help them cope  with the fallout from the worst financial crisis in decades.

Matthias Machnig, Germany’s State Secretary for the  Environment, told a news briefing yesterday tariffs on imports  from countries that do not tackle carbon emissions would send  the wrong signal to the international community. “There are two problems — the WTO (World Trade  Organisation), and the signal would be that this is a new form  of eco-imperialism,” Machnig said. “I don’t think this is a very  helpful signal for the international negotiations.”

European environment and energy ministers are meeting in  Sweden to try to come up with a single vision of how the  27-member bloc will fight global warming. The meeting has been described as a “final training camp”  ahead of a summit later this year in Copenhagen when  negotiations on a successor to the Kyoto Protocol take place.

French Energy Minister Jean-Louis Borloo said EU member  states needed urgently to step up to the plate and get more  developed nations on board while lashing out at the United  States and Canada for moving too slowly on climate change.

Carbon tariffs to protect European industry, although not  ideal, should be an option if Copenhagen fails, he told Reuters.

“This is not an end in itself. But we will have to explain  ourselves to the European workers,” he said.

The U.S. House of Representatives has already passed  legislation that contains carbon tariffs. It would allow the  United States to impose duties on imports of carbon-intensive  goods such as steel, cement, paper and glass from countries that  have not taken steps to reduce their own emissions.

But Swedish Environment Minister Andreas Carlgren, whose  country holds the six-month European Union presidency, said  member states currently had no “plan B” beyond landing a deal in  Copenhagen. He said there was as yet no official proposal on the  table from the French regarding carbon tariffs.  “We are absolutely against each try to make use of green  protectionism,” Carlgren told Reuters. “There should be no  threat of borders, of walls or barriers for imports from  developing countries.”

EU Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs has said member  states should keep the French idea in mind, but also worries how  such tariffs could be viewed by other countries.