UK court makes “historic” terrorism evidence ruling

The government expressed disappointment at the “unhelpful”  verdict, handed down over the case brought by two men suspected  of terrorism-related activities, saying it would make it harder  to keep the country safe.

The court ruled that a person could not be denied bail  solely on the basis of secret evidence.

The judges concluded such applications should be treated the  same as “control order” cases, where terrorism suspects must be  given an “irreducible minimum” of information about the case  against them, the Press Association reported.

The decision is another judicial defeat for ministers over  security measures, beefed up after the Sept. 11 attacks amid  much criticism from human rights campaigners.

“I am surprised and disappointed that the court has made  this ruling. My sole objective is protecting the public and this  judgment will make that job harder,” said Home Secretary Alan  Johnson.

He said the two suspects, a Pakistani student known as XC  and an Algerian referred to as U who face deportation on the  grounds they pose a risk to national security, would remain in  custody while he sought permission to appeal the verdict.

XC was one of 12 men arrested amid great publicity by  counter-terrorism police in April this year but later released  without charge as there was insufficient evidence. The men were  then told they would be deported instead.