NEW DELHI, (Reuters) – India’s biggest corruption case descended into bickering over the quality of poorly photocopied witness testimonies and noisy ceiling fans yesterday as five senior business executives fought to win bail in a packed and stuffy court.
Judge O.P. Saini deferred until Wednesday a decision on bail applications of officials from the Indian joint ventures of Norway’s Telenor , the United Arab Emirates’ Etisalat and from India’s Reliance ADA group, owned by tycoon Anil Ambani, named in the case.
Sacked telecoms minister Andimuthu Raja and the executives are charged with manipulating the granting of telecoms licences in the world’s fastest-growing telecoms market, causing a potential loss to the government of $39 billion.
In a country where top business executives and politicians have been largely seen as untouchable, the case has gripped the public amid a growing backlash from an urban middle class angry about corruption in one of the world’s fastest growing economies.
But yesterday, more mundane matters ruled, highlighting India’s archaic court system that is often criticised for taking years to deliver justice.
“The lines are missing in several statements. The documents are haphazard,” a lawyer brandishing a copy of a handwritten witness deposition told Saini. The judge acknowledged even he could not read it.
“Several pages are missing,” the lawyer said.
