It is the PPP which should be slated not Rohee

Dear Editor,

With reference to your editorial ‘Saving Mr Rohee’ (October 23, 2012), Mr Clement Rohee should not be singled out and castigated for dereliction of duty, incompetence and so on. It is indeed very unfair.
There has been a policy of not rocking the boat of the police and armed forces in general which was initiated by the late President Dr C B Jagan in1992 when he won the general elections. His declaration of no witch hunting, no recriminations, should have been followed by a stern warning to cease all excesses and wrongdoing in general which were prevalent then. By not placing a condition on forgiveness, lawlessness multiplied in every sphere, notably the police force that seems to have been converted into a corruption free for all.

There is also the ethnic fear on the part of the PPP about the armed forces being predominantly African Guyanese, hence the propensity to pamper and allow unprofessional behaviour to flourish. It is not a Rohee lapse and his incompetence, but a PPP policy. Any no confidence motion should be aimed at the government not only for crime alone, but for the abundance of negative and corrupt governance.

Mr Rohee however should be blamed for not stamping his authority on and reining in the less troubling noise nuisance problem, bribery associated with traffic officers and other blowing-out-of-proportion petty offences, that have officers taking advantage of citizens. These are matters that would not influence the upper echelons, but manageable laws should be enforced.

Complaints to any PPP officials of the police taking advantage in matters are quickly rebuffed with, “The police doing their work, we cannot interfere.” Unlike during the PNC era swift and decisive action was taken when reports were made to PNC officials of police harassment.  The late Presidents Burnham and Hoyte had no reason to fear the armed forces and could have demanded they respect professionalism and dignity unless something was sanctioned for the sake of political expediency.

The PPP camp lives in fear and exposes their supporters and citizens as a whole to police excesses, not wanting to have a confrontation. Balancing the forces may help, but the PPP has good reasons for not doing so and explains it by Indian dislike of the forces, which is obviously  not true. Mr Rohee is abiding by party policy and cannot show dissent or he would end up like Moses Nagamootoo or Khemraj Ramjattan. The police are compromised, not condemned by the PPP. Pampering the armed forces which cause Indians unease is more advantageous than balancing the forces ethnically, hence Indians are doomed under the PPP government. Please leave Rohee alone and slate the PPP.

Yours faithfully,
M Sookraj


There is no provision for the VC to step into the void in the absence of the University Council

Dear Editor, As a former Registrar and a former Member of Council, University of Guyana, I paid keen attention to the letter from the university’s unions’ to the Sunday Stabroek: ‘The government has not yet appointed a University Council’ (Jan 14).

Tender forms are on the ministry’s website

Dear Editor, The Ministry of Finance notes a letter captioned `National Tender Administration does not have forms which it has advertised’ which appeared in SN, January 16,2018, and wishes to advise that the forms are available on the Ministry’s website under the tab NPTA.

Why do we identify land for playgrounds and then use it for housing?

Dear Editor, Please allow me in your newspaper to congratulate the learned and esteemed Judge on his decision on January 8th, 2018 in the matter of the land along Eping Avenue, Bel Air Park.

If Guyana remains with two major parties these must transform

Dear Editor, By now, most of us can agree that the political culture in Guyana is stagnated, toxic and based on a tradition that traces its roots back to the divide and conquer era of the British.

Some Post & Telecoms workers land issues still not concluded

Dear Editor, My colleague Lincoln Lewis in his last Sunday commentary referred to the trade unions’ housing drive contribution.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now