Dear Editor,
With all this daily political chatter and hyperbole about the Venezuela –Guyana border issue, little analysis is being devoted as to how we got to be in this position in the first place. No mention is being made of the historical fact that Burnham created this situation for his own myopic political ends, and in harmony with Cold War objectives.
The Venezuela –Guyana border issue, was a non-issue until the risk of a pro-Soviet Jagan Government heading an independent Guyana in the 1960’s arose. The 17th February 1966 Geneva Agreement which Burnham happily signed, revived a dead claim, and gave it legal validity. It should really be called the Lazarus Agreement not the Geneva Agreement. It was a blatant Cold War project to provide a pretext for invasion, should the perceived need arise to curb Soviet influence in a post independent Guyana. It was an imperialist pre-condition for the granting of independence, which Burnham with his opportunist lust for power, went along with. But for the Lazarus Agreement there would be no legal foundation for Venezuela’s claim.
The Maduro Government has been accused by the APNU+AFC Government of using the Venezuela –Guyana border issue, to distract the Venezuelan public’s attention from internal concerns, however, the reality seems to be that if indeed Maduro is doing so, he is not alone, as the APNU+AFC Government is doing likewise with its daily utterings and military tomfoolery like “Exercise Greenheart” etc. It is preposterous to think that the GDF could ever be any match to Venezuela’s might.
As for this talk of a “juridical settlement” by referring the matter to the International Court of Justice – again Burnham has obstructed that – under the Lazarus Agreement this can only happen with Venezuela’s consent, or on a referral by the Secretary General of the United Nations. Guyana cannot initiate it. It is about time that the APNU-AFC Government told the people the truth about Burnham’s role in the Lazarus Agreement.
Lalu Hanuman,
Attorney-at-Law,
Barbados
