How long must citizens be in limbo because of Central Housing and Planning Authority’s negligence?

Dear Editor,

As is the case with all Guyanese desirous of attaining a home in our homeland, I applied for a house-lot in 2007 while a single woman. Several years later while this application was still pending approval, I got married and because of misplaced identification, I got a new ID in my married name which resulted in an update of documents with the Central Housing and Planning Authority (CHPA), when the name difference was observed during a routine follow-up. This highlights two soaring issues with this organization: the duration of time it takes for application review, approval and land allocation, and the fact there is no consultation on whether the applicant is inclined to have a change or addition of another party to their existing application. I never expected that the marriage would have ended, but it did. After that, I finally received confirmation on land availability and I, therefore, proceeded to complete payments. Subsequently, I requested the removal of my now ex-husband’s name. It took this department one year and two months with frequent visits to complete this deletion; yet another tragedy in such a modern era. With all fees paid, I was excited to obtain my agreement of sale and title (which to date I have not seen). Imagine my dismay when I was told that while the deletion was in progress, the title had been published 8 months prior. Since there was evidently an error within the department (I’ve been told that when the deletion was requested back in August 2015 a hold needed to be placed on title preparation, but that this was not done) I highlighted this to the Supervisor, Ms Stephen; Operations Manager, Mr Azore; and Director of the Land Allocation Department, Ms Tudor. I even brought it to the attention of the CEO, Mr Saul, and they all promised a prompt resolution. Almost another year later and I’m still awaiting that solution.

I’ve been told repeatedly that since the title has been published the matter must be resolved legally. The issue here is: 1. the other party is unwilling to consent to a name removal; 2. since the error occurred within CHPA they should be held accountable for a resolution (something my research reveals can be under Chapter 5:02 Sections 60 and 61 of the Land Registry Act); and 3. as a single mother of two, I cannot afford legal counsel.

In conversing with several persons in and out of the legal community, I’ve learnt that this occurs more often than not. So it begs the following questions: how is the Department of Land Allocation being managed? Are the employees fully knowledgeable and equipped to perform daily duties? Is there a performance management and appraisal system to determine and measure performance outcomes and impact on citizens? How long must citizens be in limbo because of the CHPA’s negligence and complacency while the ministry speaks of repossessing unoccupied properties?

I have no answers to these questions, but what I know is that while I’m sitting here waiting, I’m being made to pay a rent (cash that could have been paying my mortgage), and like others in my position, I’m forced to bide time since no one with the authority is taking action. Is it any wonder that Guyanese who love their native land are leaving it?

Yours faithfully,

(Name and address provided)


Lowe’s conclusion on case before CCJ was spurious

Dear Editor, In reaction to Mr Sherwood Lowe’s letter  captioned ‘Mendez has shifterd the CCJ gaze from Article 1 to Article 9 of the Constitution’ appearing in the Stabroek News of the 20th March, 2018, I would wish to submit that in my respectful recall the learned counsel for the Respondent in Richardson v Attorney General and Trotman asseverated that, in the absence of a credible definition of the terms “democratic” and “sovereignty” in Articles 1 and 9 of the Guyana Constitution, the court was required to construe these terms.

A stint in Parliament does not prepare anyone for proper management of a government ministry

Dear Editor, Our system of government is supposed to be the Westminster system, but it is not in use in Guyana today.

This society needs to embrace more liberated and progressive thinking

Dear Editor, Milton Bruce’s letter ‘The Editor-in-Chief makes all the decisions’ (SN, March 20) refers.

Realistic solutions not rhetoric are needed to bring relief to the sugar workers

Dear Editor, Regional Executive Officer of Region Six, Ms Kim Stephens, is reported in the March 19, 2018 Stabroek News, during her remarks at the ceremony to honour the Rose Hall Martyrs on March 13, 2018, “that that severed sugar workers are ‘timid and afraid’ of diversification”.

Government did not provide $68M in the national budget for the IDPAD conference

Dear Editor, It would be remiss of me not to address the Guyana Times article of March 9, 2018: ‘Govt yet to receive report on $68M IDPAD conference’, since it is either a malicious article or one in which the author is wallowing in ignorance.


Not Ready to Subscribe ?

You can still join over other 15,000 subscribers and receive FREE breaking news alerts as they happen and the morning brief featuring top stories of the day. 

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now