Cricket Ombudsman

Followers of local cricket are shaking their heads in disbelief once again, as the local ruling body, the Guyana Cricket Board (GCB), has conjured yet another Machiavellian manoeuvre.  This time around, it’s the appointment of the Cricket Ombudsman.

 In January, 2015 the previous government announced the appointment of Dr Winston McGowan, a Guyanese historian, as Guyana’s first Cricket Ombudsman.  At the press conference, it was declared that the post was new to Guyana and it was a feature of the Guyana Cricket Administration Act (GCAA) which had been passed in Parliament on May 15, 2014.

“Among his responsibilities as the Cricket Ombudsman, Dr McGowan is responsible for those elections at the, or of the recognized cricketing organizations in Guyana of their officials. Essentially, from henceforth, and in accordance with the Cricket Administration Law, the elections of officers of these recognized cricketing organizations would be conducted by a Cricket Ombudsman,” Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr Roger Luncheon, was quoted as saying at the time.

The newly appointed Cricket Ombudsman was tasked with the responsibility of verifying the clubs which came under the aegis of the various county boards, namely Berbice, Demerara and Essequibo, which comprise the Guyana Cricket Board.

Dr McGowan’s appointment was of course challenged by the GCB on their favourite pitch, the Law Courts, on the grounds that the then Minister of Sport Dr Frank Anthony had not contacted the ruling regional body, the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB), now Cricket West Indies (CWI).

The matter was subsequently thrown out by the then Acting Chief Justice Ian Chang after Dr Anthony , in court arguments, had stated that he had contacted the WICB on three occasions and never received an answer from the regional body. Justice Chang, in his ruling, said that three times was enough and ruled that the Cricket Ombudsman had been properly appointed.

However, the GCB, along with the Essequibo Cricket Board, the East Bank Cricket Association, the Eccles Cricket Club and Guyana Cricket Inc, had on 29 April, 2015 secured an injunction suspending all elections of office bearers of bodies under the GCAA 2014 until the hearing and determination of the substantive action, thus , delaying any work by the Cricket Ombudsman.

The injunction was subsequently discharged on June 16, 2017, paving the way for the long-awaited elections of the GCB. Of course, the GCB appealed the decision.

In July, 2017, following a call by the new government to meet with the GCB and cricket stakeholders, the then Minister of Education with responsibility for Sports, Nicolette Henry announced at a press conference held in the presence of the Attorney General, at his Chambers, that she was going to meet with the Cricket Ombudsman to chart a way forward as it relates to holding elections for the Guyana Cricket Board.

“I will certainly act within the powers granted to me as the Minister with responsibility for Sport to ensure that due process takes places and since there is no current impediment to holding of those elections, I will certainly provide the necessary permission so that process can take place,” the Minister was quoted as saying at the press conference.  According to the GCAA, the Ombudsman and the Minister responsible for Sport are the officials authorized to set the date for elections.

Following the Minister’s announcement a leading official from the GCB promised to work with both parties to have the matter resolved, but reaffirmed their position that the GCAA was flawed since they had not been consulted before the Bill had been laid in Parliament. The GCB member noted that they intended to continue to use the judicial system to have their objections heard.

However, the process never got going, allegedly because the Ombudsman never received the co-operation of the GCB. Reportedly frustrated at being unable to perform his duties as the Ombudsman, Dr McGowan resigned last year. Current Minister of Sport, Dr George Norton is yet to name his replacement.

Two Thursdays ago, the GCB held an Extraordinary Meeting and appointed its own Cricket Ombudsman, Attorney-at-Law Stephen Lewis.  The GCB, which has allegedly never accepted the GCAA, made the appointment, according to GCAA Clause 10; “There shall be an authority known as the Cricket Ombudsman who shall hold office for a period of three years after the Ombudsman has been elected by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting at an extraordinary meeting of the Guyana Cricket Board.”

The Berbice Cricket Board (BCB), which in February held court supervised elections, quickly filed two actions in court; challenging the legality of Lewis’ appointment and seeking to prevent him from functioning in the capacity of Cricket Ombudsman.

The GCAA at 21:03 states,  “The governing Minister must appoint the Cricket Ombudsman and the Ombudsman must see the first election before the authority to elect a new ombudsman falls into the hands of the GCB.”

The GCB argued that it can appoint the Cricket Ombudsman because the Minister’s appointee has resigned. However, no GCB elections had been held under the Minister-appointed Ombudsman. Yesterday, the courts granted the BCB request for an injunction against the GCB. Of course the standard appeal by the GCB is expected forthwith.

Meanwhile, following Berbice’s lead, Demerara is pushing for court supervised elections. The matter is to be heard later this month.

 In many quarters, it is felt that the last free and fair Guyana Cricket Board elections were held in 2009 with the two-year term of office having expired in 2011. Yesterday was four years since the GCAA was passed in Parliament. 

The incumbent GCB, with the endorsement of the CWI, a spider web of court injunctions, alleged claims of phantom clubs and boards continues to maintain its control of the local game.  A weary follower of the game can only ask, will this imbroglio ever be resolved?

Niccolo Machiavelli, author of The Prince, would be proud.

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

We built stabroeknews.com using new technology. This makes our website faster, more feature rich and easier to use for 95% of our readers.
Unfortunately, your browser does not support some of these technologies. Click the button below and choose a modern browser to receive our intended user experience.

Update my browser now

×