Dear Editor,
Is it that his legal colleagues in the administration are too distracted to attend to their junior in obvious distended labour, who exposes a discomfiting degree of intellectual constipation?
For how could he be allowed to confirm the palpable inability to distinguish between ‘appointment’ and ‘nomination’, and worse, compromise the integrity of the nominee by the virtual rejection of his candidature – in his presence?
Hopefully by now the otherwise qualified individual would have evaluated the insensitivity of his sponsors to the unnecessary hostility they have renewed by throwing him into the pits, so to speak.
It would be in the latter’s interest therefore to relieve himself, not only of the discomfort he would have experienced, but moreso the agony of the ensuing impasse, by retreating voluntarily from what is but a revived stalemate.
Yours faithfully,
E.B. John
