Dear Editor,
Is the costly Biometric marking of Fuel by the Guyana Energy Agency (GEA) still necessary given the changing oil supply dynamics?
The Guyana Energy Agency introduced the Biometric marking of all imported fuels under its previous late head Mr. Joseph O’Lall circa 2003 in an effort to combat fuel smuggling . The existing condition then was that fuel sold on the local markets of Trinidad and Venezuela was heavily subsidized by their respective governments and sold extremely cheaper than the regular export market prices. Fuel smugglers capitalized on this disparity in prices and in collaboration with locals in Trinidad and Venezuela smuggled the subsidized fuel into Guyana and undersold the legitimate suppliers who bought their fuel from those countries’ refineries at the regular Platts market pricing.
The GEA in their effort to identify and curb the fuel smuggling introduced the marking of all fuels imported by authorized dealers with a biological marker, hence any fuel found without this Biometric marker would be illegal. This Biometric marker came at a cost which GEA charged to the oil companies and they in turn factored this into their selling price at the gas stations.
Fast-forward to present-day conditions in Trinidad and Venezuela with respect to fuel supply where the situation is now totally different.
Trinidad has closed down their refinery and is now importing all its fuel requirement for local consumption and export. They have removed the subsidy and all their fuels are now sold at market prices.
Venezuela on the other hand has gone through a complete reversal from having fuel being smuggled out of their country to fuel now being smuggled into the country due to the tremendous shortages caused by dysfunctional refineries.
Clearly the situation no longer presents itself as a primary source for fuel smugglers to operate in these two countries, therefore we should ask the quintessential question whether fuel smuggling is still a threat to legitimate dealers. If our review shows that it is not then we should do away with the Biometric marking system and its associated cost on the price at the pump.
There is an old management anecdote told about relevance when the House of Commons in England was painted centuries ago. A guard was posted outside to warn the members of the House not to touch the walls since it was freshly painted. As the story goes the guard was still posted centuries after the wall had dried. No one bothered to review the posting or its raison d’etre.
Yours faithfully,
Reggie Bhagwandin
