Dear Editor,
Out of the jurisdiction but vehicle used in the committal of an alleged crime. That demands answers and explanations. While, maybe, not personally involved in the actual execution of the alleged, initial harassment of a citizen, which went awry and turned deadly, the fact that personal property was involved, it can be perceived, that would make the owner complicit and raises serious questions about involvement.
There has been no claim the vehicle was stolen to commit the act. Lots of questions, no answers but only cries of reckless police bulletin. The compelling, searching question is how were the executioners able to get hold of the vehicle when the owner is out of the country? It gets weirder the finding of the vehicle parked in a yard in which the owner of the vehicle and occupant of the yard know each other.
Funny situation. The bulletin should stand.
Yours faithfully,
Shamshun Mohamed
