Dear Editor,
The conduct of the affairs of the Local Government Commission is symptomatic of the Government`s approach to the Rule of Law and Good Governance and exemplifies the emergence of a fascist state, something of which the PPP previously accused the PNC Government. Our structures, and culture, of governance are both conducive to such an emergence, in our circumstance of a plural society, majoritarian rule, and the dominance of two ethnically based parties. Our constitutional commissions and even other deliberative organs of the state are constituted in such a manner, and vested with such procedural autonomy that enables the ruling party to determine how, and what, decisions are made without reference or deference to the Rule of Law or the principles of Good Governance.
The composition of the Commission clearly allows the Government to exercise ultimate control. The President has three nominees. The National Assembly, which is controlled by the Government has one nominee. The Minister responsible for Local Government has one nominee. That accounts for five nominees at the Government`s behest. The remaining three members are nominees of the Leader of the Opposition. Clearly, the Government has the scope to determine what, and how, decisions are made. This is beyond just deduction. The empirical evidence of the voting pattern in the decision making process clearly shows that the votes are cast in bloc and the Government`s five always prevail, as was the case of the imposition of Gaspar, the PPP`s lead activist in Linden, as the Town Clerk of the Mayor and Town Council of Linden.
Procedurally, the only procedure that`s eventually observed is the casting of votes. The Good Governance requirement: transparency, is observed in the breach. The vote trumps decision making based on known criteria, such as the required qualifications and experience, in the instance of employment. Incidentally, a similar situation exists at GECOM and has resulted in the top offices, to wit the offices of the Chief Elections Officer and the Deputy Chief Elections Officer, being occupied by persons who did not meet the stipulated criteria of GECOM, although there were other applicants who met the criteria. The aforementioned instance is but a tip of the iceberg with regard to the manner in which this Government has undermined the Rule of Law and Good Governance in its pursuit of dominance and control over national affairs that even impinge on the lives of individuals to the extent that one can refer to the situation as an emerging fascist state. Ironically, this Government spouts the Rule of Law, and Good Governance as its guiding principles, but observes them in the breach. The practice is quite the opposite.
Sincerely,
Vincent Alexander
