Govts agree independent review of UN climate panel

NUSA DUA, Indonesia, (Reuters) – An independent board  of scientists is to review the work of a U.N. climate panel,  whose credibility came under attack after it published errors, a  U.N. environment spokesman said yesterday.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)  accepted last month that its 2007 report had exaggerated the  pace of melt of Himalayan glaciers, and this month admitted the  report had also overstated how much of the Netherlands is below  sea level.

The report shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with former  U.S. Vice President Al Gore, and has driven political momentum  to agree a new, more ambitious climate treaty to replace the  Kyoto Protocol.

The remit and process of the review panel would be disclosed  next week, said Nick Nuttall, spokesman for the U.N. Environment  Programme, on the sidelines of a UNEP conference of environment  ministers and officials from more than 135 countries in the  Indonesian island of Bali.

“It will be a credible, sensible review of how the IPCC  operates, to strengthen its fifth report,” he said.

“It should do a review of the IPCC, produce a report by,  say, August. There is a plenary of the IPCC in South Korea in  October. The review will go there for adoption. I think we are  bringing some level of closure to this issue.”

The latest, fourth IPCC report was published in 2007 and the  next is due in 2014.

All options are on the table for the review, Nuttall said,  including, how to treat “grey literature” — a term for academic  papers which are not published in peer-reviewed journals.

The IPCC had said that the Himalayas could melt by 2035, but  an original source spoke of the world’s glaciers melting by  2350, not 2035. The IPCC report had cited the 2035 year from a  non-peer reviewed WWF paper, which in turn had referred to a  Scientific American article.

Public conviction of global warming’s risks may have been  undermined by the panel’s errors and by the disclosure of hacked  emails revealing scientists sniping at sceptics, who leapt on  these as evidence of data fixing.

Pachauri told Reuters on Wednesday that the IPCC stood by  its main 2007 finding — that it was more than 90 percent  certain that human activities were the main cause of global  warming in the past 50 years.

Governments and ministers attending the conference this week  in Bali reaffirmed their confidence that manmade greenhouse gas  emissions were stoking climate change, said Nuttall.

“There was absolutely no government, no minister of  environment who attended that meeting who said that the IPCC was  the wrong vehicle for understanding the science of climate  change,” Nuttall added.

The IPCC’s 2007 assessment report on the causes and impacts  of climate change was over 3,000 pages long, cited more than  10,000 scientific papers and is policymakers’ main data source.