US considers options to curb Iran’s nuclear programme

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, releasing a statement yesterday about a secret memorandum he sent to the White House in  January, said he identified “next steps in our defence planning  process” that would be reviewed by decision makers in the  coming weeks and months.

“There should be no confusion by our allies and adversaries  that the United States is properly and energetically focused on  this question and prepared to act across a broad range of  contingencies in support of our interests,” Gates said in the  statement, issued to refute characterizations of the memo in a  New York Times report.

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US military’s Joint  Chiefs of Staff, said yesterday the military options available  to Obama would go “a long way” to delaying Iran’s nuclear  progress but may not set the country back long-term. He called  a military strike his “last option” right now.

The comments underscored the difficult choices facing Obama  in trying to keep Iran from getting a nuclear bomb without  setting off a broader conflict.

“It’s very hard to predict outcomes there,” Mullen told  reporters after addressing a forum at Columbia University in  New York.

Mullen said there was “not much decision space to work in  because of both outcomes — having a weapon and striking  generate unintended consequences that are difficult to  predict.”     “I think Iran having a nuclear weapon would be incredibly  destabilizing. I think attacking them would also create the  same kind of outcome,” he added.

The Times reported on Saturday that Gates’s memo was meant  as a warning to the White House that the United States lacked  an effective strategy to curb Iran’s steady progress toward  nuclear capability.