U.N. climate panel agrees reforms; chairman stays

SINGAPORE/OSLO, (Reuters) – The U.N. panel of climate  scientists agreed yesterday to change its practices in  response to errors in a 2007 report, and its chairman, Rajendra  Pachauri of India, dismissed suggestions he should step down.

At an Oct. 11-14 meeting in Busan, South Korea, the  130-nation panel agreed to tighten fact-checking in reports that  help guide the world’s climate and energy policies and to set up  a “task force” to decide on wider reforms by mid-2011.

“Change and improvement are vital to the IPCC,” Pachauri  told a telephone news conference by the Intergovernmental Panel  on Climate Change, which shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with  former U.S. Vice President Al Gore.

The IPCC has been under fire after errors in its last report  in 2007, led by a projection that global warming could melt all  Himalayan glaciers by 2035 — centuries before the worst-case  thaw.

The InterAcademy Council (IAC), grouping experts from  national science academies, called on Aug. 30 for “fundamental  reform” of IPCC management and said panel leaders should serve  only one six-year term, rather than the current maximum of two.

Pachauri, re-elected in 2008 to a second term, said a  one-term limit, if adopted, would apply only to future IPCC  leaders when he steps down in 2014 after presenting the next  report.

“I have every intention of staying right till I have  completed the mission that I have accepted,” he said.

In a later interview with Reuters, he said he would view it  as a “dereliction of duty” to hand over mid-way. “I work 18  hours a day, I don’t get a single holiday, I am travelling all  the time. I could make my life easier by withdrawing,” he said.

He said there were benefits from continuity and experience.

And he said that the IPCC’s basic 2007 finding — that it is  at least 90 percent certain that human activities led by use of  fossil fuels are the main cause of recent global warming — was  unaffected by errors.

Pachauri also rebuffed suggestions that the IPCC could issue  more frequent reports. “Knowledge is moving rapidly but not as  rapidly as might warrant producing reports with greater  frequency,” he said.

The IPCC agreed new guidelines to tighten checks, as well as  rules for fixing mistakes and for handling material that had not  been peer reviewed by scientists.

Task forces would look into issues such as management of the  Geneva-based IPCC Secretariat, which has a budget of about $5  million a year. Among IAC recommendations were the appointment  of an “Executive Secretary” and extra communications staff.

Pachauri told Reuters the next report would look harder at  issues such as geo-engineering — ways to affect the global  climate such as by reflecting sunlight with mirrors or  fertilising seas to encourage growth of carbon-absorbing algae.

“Geo-engineering is an area that will get clearer focus,” he  said.

Experts are looking for new ways to slow global warming  after the Copenhagen summit last year failed to agree a binding  treaty to cut emissions of greenhouse gases.

Among other areas, the panel would seek to work out more  about sea level rise and how clouds would form in a warmer world  when there will be more moisture in the air. White cloud tops  can reflect sunlight and keep the planet cool.