The paradox of food insecurity in Guyana’s rich agricultural landscape

Dear Editor,

It is an oxymoron when you hear Guyanese and their leaders say that they cannot feed themselves because food is unaffordable in Guyana, a country blessed with abundant natural resources and a vast expanse of fertile land spanning over 83,000 square miles. Yet, a perplexing paradox persists – the claim that Guyanese cannot feed themselves due to the purported high cost of food. In a nation with a population of less than 800,000, the contradiction raises questions about the underlying factors contributing to this seemingly counterintuitive situation. It is no secret, Guyana’s landscape boasts rich agricultural potential, with fertile soils and favourable climatic conditions. As such, the nation possesses the necessary ingredients for self-sufficiency in food production.

With an array of crops and livestock that can thrive in this diverse environment, the idea that Guyanese struggle to put food on their tables appears paradoxical. Politicians or pseudo politicians never point out one key factor contributing to this paradox is the relatively small population of Guyana. With fewer than 800,000 people, the nation has the potential to achieve food security with effective agricultural practices. The challenge lies in addressing issues such as infrastructure, distribution networks, and market access, which are essential for translating agricultural potential into practical food affordability for the population. To break free from the oxymoron of struggling to feed themselves in a land of plenty, Guyana must prioritize and invest in empowering local agriculture, including at individual or cooperative level. Supporting small-scale farmers including those involved in subsistence farming, promoting sustainable farming practices including manure processing, and creating avenues for market access can contribute to a more resilient and self-sufficient food system.

On the contrary, there are the ever-present cries for more cash handouts from the government. In conclusion, the paradox of Guyana’s struggle to feed its population in a country abundant with natural resources and vast land raises important questions about the intersection of geography, economics, and governance. While challenges exist, there is immense potential for Guyana to overcome this paradox and emerge as a shining example of sustainable agriculture and food affordability. Through strategic investments, policy reforms, and a collective commitment to harnessing the nation’s agricultural potential, Guyana can transform its narrative and ensure that its people truly benefit from the bountiful land they call home.

Sincerely,

Keith Bernard