Previous police service commission was suspended for refusing the president’s request to promote ‘his boys’

Dear Editor,

I read with much dismay a statement from Hon. Gail Teixeira MP, Minister of Parliamentary Affairs and Government under the caption, “Burke one man organisation continues to spread racist remarks.” Several persons included Rickford Burke, Paul Slowe and GHK Lall have responded adequately to her. How-ever, Editor, please permit me to have my two bits in the confabulation. The Minister came out smoking but there was no fire. Here is what she posited, “Paul Slowe was suspended as Chairman of the Police Service Commission because he refused to appoint senior officers recommended by the Commissioner of Police (Ag), 90 percent of whom were Afro Guyanese.” This statement is an erratic flight of the Minister’s imagination. It is complete fabrication and total distortion of facts. Here are the facts at issue, facts relevant to the facts at issue and facts which introduce and explain.

As a former member of the Police Service Commission, I believe that the statement under review is not only an attack on the character and integrity of Paul Slowe, but that of Michael Somersall, Vesta Adams, Claire Jarvis and I, Clinton Conway, all former members of the PSC. The former members have given me their express permission to respond to Gail Teixeira. The Commission, which was chaired by Paul Slowe, was not a one man Commission or a Paul Slowe Commission. It was the Police Service Commission. All its members were active participants in the decision making process of the Commission. On one occasion, we even out voted the Chairman. Let me be pellucid, Paul Slowe was not suspended because he refused to appoint senior members of the GPF as recommended by the Commissioner of Police (Ag). Paul Slowe’s, and other members of the PSC’s suspension, were purely political. He refused the request of the President to promote ‘his boys’.

I will not comment on that issue further as the matter is before the Court. It was Snr. Superintendent Calvin Brutus who blocked the promotion of one hundred and thirty two officers in a Court action against the PSC. He was joined in his action by Snr. Superintendent Bacchus, Deputy Superintendent Stanley, Woman Assistant Superintendent Jupiter and Inspector Prem Narine. They all had disciplinary matters pending against them at the Police Service Commission. One was the subject of a criminal probe apart from the disciplinary matter.  All of the officers mentioned above were recently promoted by the not fully constituted Police Service Commission despite the fact that their disciplinary matters were not resolved. The current Police Service Commission is not fully constituted.

According to the Constitution of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana, it must consist of five members. Only four members were appointed. One of the five must be the Chairperson of the Public Service Commission. There is no Public Service Commission. After Brutus and party lost their Court case, the PSC immediately proceeded to promote one hundred and thirty two officers. In ‘labba’ time Anil Nandlall SC, the Attorney General said that his government did not recognise the promotions and took action to prevent the promotion taking effect. The promotions were blocked. The matter is still pending. Gail Teixeira said that ninety percent of the officers that the previous PSC did not promote were Afro Guyanese. Where did she get that figure from? I hate to use the term Afro or Indo Guyanese. A Trini is a Trini, a Bajan is a Bajan, a Jamaican is a Jamaican. Likewise, a Guyanese is a Guyanese. Not Afro or Indo Guyanese. The use of Afro and Indo Guyanese do not go well towards promoting a ONE GUYANA policy. However, it was used before in relation to the GPF.

During the ‘60s when Dr. Cheddi Jagan was crying in the wilderness, he expressed his disappointment that Afro Guyanese were the dominant race in the Force. He said that there was not a brown face in the Police Force and called for efforts to correct the racial balance. There was the report on Racial Balance in the Guyana Police Force by the Inter-national Commission of Jurists (ICJ) in 1965. As a result, numerous Indo Guyanese were recruited into the Force. We used to call them ICJ Police. The recruitment trend did not continue for long. For diverse reasons the enlistment of Afro Guyanese continued to dominate. Dr. Jagan subsequently flip flopped and called on his supporters not to join the Force as he saw the GPF as an oppressive arm of the State. When Dr. Jagan became President, he made a 360 degree turn. He encouraged his supporters to join the Force. Many joined but the numbers have declined significantly.

Several years ago the ratio was 8 to 1 in favour of Afro Guyanese. I do not know what the current ratio is but East Indians are in the minority in the Force. The Service Commission, under which I served, never looked at race when dealing with promotion. Snr. Superintendent Calvin Brutus in an interview with one of the Public Relations Officers said that the police looked at race and gender when dealing with promotion. After questions were asked the uploader hurriedly pulled down the information. An analysis of the last promotion by the not fully constituted PSC revealed the following: 5 out of 8 Assistant Commissioners were Indo Guyanese; 7 out of the 11 Senior Super-intendents were Indo Guyanese; 10 of the 21 Superintendents were Indo Guyanese. No female made it to the rank of Assistant Commissioner or Senior Superintendent. The males took gold, silver and bronze. To use a horse racing term, the females ‘also ran’.  Regional Command 1, 2, 3, 4 (b), 4(c) and 6 are all headed by Indo Guyanese. Are they all competent commanders? I have my doubts. There is no female Regional Commander.

In closing, let me hasten to urge the movers and shakers of the GPF to resurrect the Report of the Disciplined Forces Commission 2004, headed by Appeal Court Judge Ian Chang SC, and take action. The report is very instructive. It contains several sections with recommendations that will enhance the performance of the GPF and cater for greater public confidence and trust in the GPF. They are: Functions and Operations; Composition and Structure; Recruitment, Training and Promotion; Ethnic Balance; Community Policing; Extra Judicial Killings; Accountability to Civilian Authority; Firearms; Complaint against Police and Coroners Act. I rest my case. May God help the Guyana Police Force!

Sincerely,

Clinton Conway

Assistant Commissioner of Police

(Ret’d)