Letters to the Editor

In accordance with the law?

Dear Editor, Page 414 of the March 15 parliamentary debate on Paper 7 for replenishment of the Contingencies Fund, Mr Khemraj, the AFC MP drew the attention of the National Assembly to section 24 of the Fiscal Management and Accountability Act (FMAA) which  requires the Finance Minister, “when introducing a supplementary appropriation Bill, [to] present to the National Assembly the reasons for the proposed variations and provide a supplementary document describing the impact that the variations, if approved will have on the financial plan in the annual budget.”

Not forced to condemn the budget cuts

Dear Editor, Please allow us to clear the air on pronouncements made by APNU Public Relations Officer Malika Ramsey on the May 13 airing of Nation Watch, which stated that employees of the Government Information Agency (GINA), were forced or threatened to make statements condemning the 2012 Budget cuts.

More in the mortar than the pestle

Dear Editor, In Sunday Stabroek’s editorial of May 13, 2012, the view was expressed that, “One cannot help but feel that the governing party has no idea what it is doing at the moment, or what it should be doing in the circumstances.“

Mechanisms for requiring government agencies to account for external grant funds received after the Budget has been approved are not functioning

Dear Editor, With reference to your editorial ‘The Norway funds’ (May 14), I wish to mention that on November 7, 2011, the Steering Committee of the Guyana REDD+ Investment Fund (GRIF), which is comprised of representatives of the Governments of Guyana and Norway, approved the disbursement of US$5.94M to the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) for disbursement to Guyana for project related activities, plus administrative fees of US$140,000.

Today's Paper

The ePaper edition, on the Web & in stores for Android, iPhone & iPad.

Included free with your web subscription. Learn more.